Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
8120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800M
0.162 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +9004%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
550 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
9
SM Count
-
72
Shading Units
8192
24
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.488 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
13.46 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
162.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
N10P-GLM4
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
8 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy