Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800M and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
6072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800M
0.162 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +11733%
19.17 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
550 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
160bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
280.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
9
SM Count
48
72
Shading Units
6144
24
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.488 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
124.8 GPixel/s
13.46 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
162.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
70W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
AD104
N10P-GLM4
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy