Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M and 16GB VRAM Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1329MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
3536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB +7400%
9.526 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jun 2016
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1190 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1329 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
56
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
3584
24
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

8.480 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
127.6 GPixel/s
12.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
297.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.05 TFLOPS
127.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.526 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
4.763 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
GP100
NB9E-GLM2
GPU Variant
GP100-893-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy