Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA GRID K100

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA GRID K100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 256MB VRAM GRID K100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.14GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
Lower TDP (70W vs 130W)
NVIDIA GRID K100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
GRID K100 +103%
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
799 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
130W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GK107
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy