Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.14GB/s vs 34.14GB/s)
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 1 months late
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB +300%
0.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
LPDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
34.14GB/s

Render Config

8
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
64
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
16
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1280 GFLOPS
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
640.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
320.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GA10B
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
Unknown
324 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

70W
TDP
10W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy