Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4592 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 +36968%
16.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
72
16
Shading Units
4608
8
TMUs
288
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
169.9 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
509.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.62 TFLOPS
44.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.31 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
509.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

28W
TDP
260W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
TU102
GT218 GL
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy