Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 470 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 470 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Quadro FX 470 and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 470 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
8176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 470
0.045 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M +32677%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
16GB
System Shared
Memory Type
HBM2e
System Shared
Memory Bus
4096bit
System Dependent
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
8192
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
4.640 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

38W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

C79
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
-
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy