Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 470 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

NVIDIA Quadro FX 470 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Quadro FX 470 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 470 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
14064 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 470
0.045 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X +106277%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
128GB
System Shared
Memory Type
HBM2e
System Shared
Memory Bus
8192bit
System Dependent
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
1
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
14080
8
TMUs
880
4
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
4.640 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

38W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

C79
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
-
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy