Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 51W)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
336 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D +531%
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GK107
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
51W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy