Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla S1070

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla S1070

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 800W)
NVIDIA Tesla S1070 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Tesla S1070 +8%
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
240
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GT200B
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
800W
-
Suggested PSU
1200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy