Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla P4

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla P4

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 8GB VRAM Tesla P4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Tesla P4 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Tesla P4 +897%
5.704 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K2000M
35
Tesla P4 +1008%
388
OctaneBench
Quadro K2000M
12
Tesla P4 +608%
85
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Sep 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
886 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
71.30 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
178.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
89.12 GFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.704 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
178.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GP104
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GP104-895-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy