Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
5760 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T +1833%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
6144
32
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
350W
-
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy