Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P600 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1557MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.13GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
Lower TDP (40W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro P600 +109%
1.196 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K2000M
35
Quadro P600 +248%
122
OctaneBench
Quadro K2000M
12
Quadro P600 +91%
23
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1329 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1557 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
3
384
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.91 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.37 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.68 GFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1196 GFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.37 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
40W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GP107
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy