Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
528 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M +597%
0.753 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
576
Shading Units
48
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GT216
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
32W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy