Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
464 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 78W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M +168%
0.753 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
576
Shading Units
112
48
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
78W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G92
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy