Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
12736 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250 +5910%
45.26 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
208
-
-
-
576
Shading Units
13312
48
TMUs
832
32
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Aldebaran
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy