Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Quadro K4000 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (134.8GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4000 +159%
1.244 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Dec 2010
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1404 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
134.8GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
384 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

12.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1244 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
62W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy