Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Tesla P10

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Tesla P10

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 24GB VRAM Tesla P10 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla P10 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 90% (1493MHz vs 784MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (694.3GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
Tesla P10 +444%
11.47 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Sep 2016
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
1025 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1808 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
694.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
1344
Shading Units
3840
112
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
143.3 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
358.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
179.2 GFLOPS
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.47 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GP102
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy