NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 109% (1612MHz vs 771MHz)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
+132%
8.253 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K5200
293
RTX A2000 Embedded
+582%
2001
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
2304
Shading Units
2560
192
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
60W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
Unknown
561 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
