Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 238W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050 +19%
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
384
Shading Units
448
24
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
238W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GF100
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy