Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 55W)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M +50%
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K620M +134%
82
Quadro K2000M
35
OctaneBench
Quadro K620M +50%
18
Quadro K2000M
12
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
GK107
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.27 billion
Unknown
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy