Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5500 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (1165MHz vs 924MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.4GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M5500 Mobile +152%
4.772 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000 SE
1.892 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
823 MHz
1165 MHz
Boost Clock
924 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.4GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

74.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.57 GPixel/s
149.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.772 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.892 TFLOPS
149.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.14 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GM204
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy