Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 123% (1950MHz vs 876MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M600M
0.673 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140 +493%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

837 MHz
Base Clock
1600 MHz
876 MHz
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.008 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
672.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
21.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy