Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M620 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (977MHz vs 784MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 108W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M620 Mobile
1 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200 +110%
2.107 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro M620 Mobile
27
Quadro K4200 +18%
32
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

756 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
977 MHz
Boost Clock
784 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1344
32
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

15.63 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
31.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
31.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy