CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
VS
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (436.2GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
4088 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI25
+53334%
12.29 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
VS
Radeon Instinct MI25
Graphics Card
Aug 2008
Release Date
Jun 2017
NVS Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
852 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
436.2GB/s
Render Config
1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
8
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
Vega 10
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Board Design
12W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Tesla M40
2
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
3
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro K620
4
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
5
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q
6
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
7
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q
8
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs AMD Instinct MI300A
9
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500
10
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy