Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (436.2GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
4088 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI25 +53334%
12.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jun 2017
NVS Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
852 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
436.2GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
8
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
Vega 10
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Board Design

12W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy