Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 34W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
8 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380 +52%
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Mar 2009
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
16
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
G96
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
65 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

12W
TDP
34W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy