Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 2800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2800M +893%
0.288 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Dec 2009
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
12
16
Shading Units
96
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
288.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

21W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy