Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
1872 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile +4072%
5.299 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

945 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
6
1920
Shading Units
48
120
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
165.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
10.60 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
165.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
G94
N19E-Q1-KA-K1
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy