Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (2100MHz vs 1455MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 24GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
14848 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
13.41 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +1118%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2019
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Turing-M
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1275 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
304
4608
Shading Units
19456
288
TMUs
880
96
ROPs
0
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

139.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
419.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
MI300
-
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
146 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
750W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy