Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs AMD FirePro W4150M

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs AMD FirePro W4150M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM and 1024MB VRAM FirePro W4150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4150M 's Advantages
Boost Clock850MHz
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
FirePro W4150M +69%
0.652 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Unknown
Embedded
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
850 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.800 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
652.8 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

30W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
Mars
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy