Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs AMD Radeon R7 M260

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs AMD Radeon R7 M260

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9171 MCM and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1219MHz vs 980MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9171 MCM +65%
1.248 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 M260
0.752 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2017
Release Date
Jun 2014
Embedded
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1124 MHz
Base Clock
940 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
980 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.840 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.52 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
752.6 GFLOPS
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
752.6 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Topaz
Lexa MCM Pro
GPU Variant
Topaz XT (216-0858020)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy