Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A400

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
RTX A400 +1510%
2.706 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Apr 2024
Radeon R600
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
120
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy