Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 3750 vs AMD FirePro W4300

ATI Radeon HD 3750 vs AMD FirePro W4300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 3750 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 22.18GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 3750
0.191 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300 +647%
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Dec 2015
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
693 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.18GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.184 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
6.368 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
191.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV635
GPU Name
Bonaire
RV635 PRO (215-0682008)
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.378 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
135 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy