Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 6625M vs AMD FirePro M8900

AMD Radeon HD 6625M vs AMD FirePro M8900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6625M and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 6625M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 6625M
0.432 TFLOPS
FirePro M8900 +202%
1.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Apr 2011
Vancouver
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
960
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
10.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

26W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Whistler
GPU Name
Blackcomb
Whistler LP
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy