Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
6624 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI210 +22758%
22.63 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2021
Release Date
Oct 2008
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

64GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1638GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

104
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
6656
Shading Units
32
416
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
707.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
181.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
50W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
G96
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
Unknown
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy