Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs AMD FirePro S9150

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
16640 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Lower TDP (235W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI325X +1512%
81.72 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2024
Release Date
Aug 2014
Radeon Instinct(MIx)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

288GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
512bit
10.3TB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
19456
Shading Units
2816
1216
TMUs
176
0
ROPs
64
1216
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

750W
TDP
235W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
153 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy