Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1264 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 5300 +10730%
4.224 TFLOPS
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Oct 2009
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1280
Shading Units
16
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
132.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
8.448 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.224 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
264.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

85W
TDP
31W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
GT218
Navi 14 PRO XE
GPU Variant
GT218-300-A2
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy