Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 5500M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

AMD Radeon Pro 5500M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5500M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (2010MHz vs 1450MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 5500M
4.454 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +177%
12.35 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Mar 2023
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1450 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

24
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
1536
Shading Units
3072
96
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

46.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
139.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
8.909 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
4.454 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
278.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
AD107
Navi 14 ULA
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy