Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD FirePro S7000

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD FirePro S7000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +135%
5.728 TFLOPS
FirePro S7000
2.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Aug 2012
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
1280
144
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy