CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
VS
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1203MHz
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+132%
5.728 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 OEM
2.464 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
VS
GeForce GTX 950 OEM
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Jan 2016
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
937 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1203 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
36
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
1024
144
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.50 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.99 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.464 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.99 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
GM206S
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
950 OEM
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
Unknown
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon 780M vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
2
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
3
AMD Radeon RX 550 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
4
AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI Radeon HD 3610
6
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD FirePro RG220
7
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM
8
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI Radeon HD 4670
9
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon HD 6570
10
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
2
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
3
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
4
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
5
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
6
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
7
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
8
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
9
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
10
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy