Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 and 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 78% (2040MHz vs 1147MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W6300
3.133 TFLOPS
CMP 100HX 210 +275%
11.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2020
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
555 MHz
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
1147 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
810 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
32bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
829.4GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
80
768
Shading Units
5120
48
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
96 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
146.8 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
367.0 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.49 TFLOPS
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.75 TFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.873 TFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
GV100
Navi 24
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.0
6.7
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy