Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 65% (2331MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400
3.58 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +252%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Sep 2021
Radeon Pro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
768
Shading Units
4480
48
TMUs
280
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
GA100
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
7 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.6
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy