Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs ATI FirePro V3750

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs ATI FirePro V3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 48W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +254%
1.248 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Sep 2008
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
48W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
RV730
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy