Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
400 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 120W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (70.40GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +243%
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jul 2009
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
70.40GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
512
Shading Units
112
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.80 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
362.9 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
120W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
G92B
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
G92-240-B1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy