CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
VS
AMD Radeon R7 260X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260X and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 260X 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (115W vs 134W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages
Boost Clock1032MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.2GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 260X
+24%
1.971 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
1.585 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 260X
VS
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Mar 2013
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
980 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1032 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
144.2GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
14
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
Theoretical Performance
17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.51 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.05 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.585 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
66.05 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Bonaire
GPU Name
GK106
Bonaire XTX (215-0839097)
GPU Variant
GK106-240-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Board Design
115W
TDP
134W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.3
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA L20
2
AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA TITAN V
3
AMD Radeon R7 260X vs AMD Radeon Pro V5300X
4
AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
5
Intel Arc A580 vs AMD Radeon R7 260X
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs AMD Radeon R7 260X
7
AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
8
AMD Radeon R7 260X vs AMD Radeon Pro V5300X
9
AMD Radeon R7 260X vs AMD Radeon R7 265
10
AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI
Related News
1
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
2
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
3
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
4
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
5
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
6
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
7
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
8
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
9
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
10
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy