Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs AMD FirePro M5950

AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs AMD FirePro M5950

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M265 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M5950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 M265 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock825MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
AMD FirePro M5950 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 M265
0.633 TFLOPS
FirePro M5950 +9%
0.696 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Jan 2011
Gem System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

725 MHz
Base Clock
-
825 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
480
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.800 GPixel/s
19.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
633.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
696.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
Whistler
Opal XT
GPU Variant
Whistler XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy