Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation

AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M265 and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 104% (1680MHz vs 825MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
9344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 M265
0.633 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation +5064%
32.69 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Mar 2023
Gem System
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

725 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
825 MHz
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
76
384
Shading Units
9728
24
TMUs
304
8
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
19.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
120W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
AD103
Opal XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy