Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (950MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB +257%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Mar 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1792
32
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Tahiti
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
Orthrus
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy