Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 220 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
464 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (58W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM +881%
0.952 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 220 OEM
0.097 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Oct 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
512
Shading Units
48
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.048 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.096 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
97.15 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
58W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GT215
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
GT215-450-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy