Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA NVS 310

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA NVS 310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
464 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM +852%
0.952 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
512
Shading Units
48
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GF119
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy